Free thinking now considered a mental illness?

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

FreeThinking1Is nonconformity and freethinking a mental illness? According to the latest edition of the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), it certainly is.

The manual identifies a new mental illness called “oppositional defiant disorder”, or ODD, which is being defined as an “ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior,” the symptoms of which are said to include questioning authority, negativity, defiance, argumentativeness, and being easily annoyed.

DSM-5_JustPub_250x250The DSM is the manual used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental illnesses and, with each new edition, there are scores of new mental illnesses. Are we becoming sicker? Is it getting harder to be mentally healthy? Authors of the DSM say that it’s because they’re better able to identify these illnesses today. Critics charge that it’s because they have too much time on their hands.

I would like to add here as to the “free thinking” part, the new mental illness of ODD, that the system has become aware of the fact that all over the world people are beginning to question what they are being told by their governments and the media and the system now is finding a way to cure those who think differently, those dissidents, of their tendencies and make then “normal” like everyone else.

Other new mental illnesses identified by the DSM include arrogance, narcissism, above-average creativity, cynicism, and antisocial behavior. In the past, these were called “personality traits,” but now they’re diseases. And, obviously, there are treatments available.

All of this is a symptom of our over-diagnosing and overmedicating culture. In the last 50 years, the DSM has gone from 130 to 357 mental illnesses. A majority of these illnesses afflict children.

Although the manual maybe an important diagnostic tool for psychiatric medicine, or should we say the psychiatric industry, it has also been responsible for social changes. The rise in ADHD, bipolar disorder, and depression in children has been largely because of the manual’s identifying certain behaviors as symptoms. A Washington Post article observed that, if Mozart were born today, he would be diagnosed with ADHD and “medicated into barren normality.”

According to the DSM, the diagnosis guidelines for identifying oppositional defiant disorder are for children, but adults can just as easily suffer from the disease. This should give any freethinking American reason for worry. Obviously, the system has to catch them early before they become adults and can become dangerous to the powers-that-be.

In Stalin's Soviet Union, and Stalinism was not defeated and dead after Stalin died – far from it – new “mental illnesses” were used for political repression. People who did not accept the beliefs of the Communist Party developed a new type of schizophrenia. They were regarded to be suffering from the delusion of believing communism was wrong or, if not communism, for many did believe communism itself to be right, then the Party and the Party was never wrong. They were isolated, forcefully medicated, and put through repressive “therapy” to bring them back to sanity.

When the last edition of the DSM was published, identifying the symptoms of various mental illnesses in children, there was a jump in the diagnosis and medication of children. Some US federal states, and also other countries, have laws that allow protective agencies to forcibly medicate, and even make it a punishable crime to withhold medication. This paints a chilling picture for those of us who are nonconformists.

Although the authors of the manual claim no ulterior motives but simply better diagnostic practices, the labeling of freethinking and nonconformity as mental illnesses has a lot of potential for abuse. It can easily become a weapon in the arsenal of a repressive state.

The system is in its last death throes and is fighting tooth and nail to keep alive. And, while the authors of the manual claim no ulterior motives, as said, I don't completely buy that story. And even if they are innocent of ulterior motives this manual can easily, nay will very easily, become a weapon of repression by the state and the powers-that-be above the states.

It would appear more and more that governments all across the world have misunderstood that “1984” was intended as a warning and not as a handbook. It is a shame that the general public who may have read the book did not see the warnings on the horizon and allowed the governments to get such power which is not due to them. They are meant to be answerable to the people but that all is smoke and mirrors and nothing more.

Seeing that I am rather a nonconformist and a freethinker it is obvious, according to the symptoms, that I must be seriously ill. Well, I don't think so. But then I might be delusional as well.

© 2014

I make no apologies for advocating paper

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

paper products in the officeUsing paper is an anathema for many in the green environmental movement but there is nothing wrong with paper, nothing whatsoever. Not even with paper made from wood pulp.

There is nothing wrong with paper for books or with using it for communications whether as letter or memo. In the same way as there is nothing wrong with wood in the form of products whatsoever. Better than using plastic by a long shot. Wooden kitchen utensils are way more hygienic than are plastic ones as the woods used for making them contain high amounts of antibacterial, antiseptic and antiviral properties.

When it comes to paper we are all being lied to left, right and center by people who either do not know what they are talking about and thus know no better or who have some other vested interest. Paper is not made from (tropical) rainforest trees. They are hardwood and the hardness of the wood simply makes them unsuitable for paper pulp, period!

Most paper is produced from spruce and other conifers specifically grown for this purpose and which are replanted after each felling and thus the entire operation is sustainable. And that ad infinitum. Most of those forests are owned by the paper industry and would not exist were it not for us using paper.

In fact, reducing the use of paper or doing without it all together would mean that the industry would no longer have any use for those forests and they would, in the end, be clear cut and turned over to some other use. And the size of those forests going in the hundreds of thousands of hectares if not more and they would be lost as forests without paper being produced and used. In addition to that millions of jobs would also be put in jeopardy if the industry would cease to exist or even would have to scale down significantly.

Then, when using paper as opposed to computer and the cloud there is the added security factor that, as long as the document is in your possession, in your filing cabinet or safe, or whatever, it is secure. The same cannot be said when held on a computer and especially not when held “in the cloud”.

It is for that reason that the Russian intelligence community is returning to the use of typewriters and paper for sensitive documents and a paper-based circulation list.

It is true that paper can be made from pulp other than wood pulp, such as from hemp – it used to be made from this plant until the early part of the 20th century, as well as from rags, as long as those are from natural fibers. In fact the Chinese, who invented paper, did make that paper from just that stuff, that is to say from rags. And that was all the while the Europeans still used vellum made from animal skins.

However, today most paper is being made from wood-pulp, predominately from coniferous trees such as spruce and fir with the occasional deciduous ones in the form of poplar and birch. Most other deciduous and even coniferous woods are too hard for the creation of pulp for the making of paper.

It is true, however, that acre for acre hemp is much more productive for fiber for the making of paper as is wood but, alas, the growing of hemp (Canabis sativa) is outlawed in most places, or strictly controlled because of the hallucinogenic properties of hemp due to its contents of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). In times past, however, it was compulsory – yes, compulsory – for farmers to give over part of the farm to the growing of hemp for making of sails and other canvas products as well as and especially for the making of paper.

The New York Times in 2012 had a great article entitled “In Defense of the Power of Paper” http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/09/jobs/pen-and-paper-still-practical-in-the-office-workstation.htmwhere even Joel Makover of the Green Business Group says that while he uses paper not that much he still prints out reports for proofreading as he finds it easier to read things on paper than on the screen and this, in fact, goes for many people.

© 2014

New study presents compelling case for GPs to put food growing ‘on prescription’

GrowingHealthA new study has shown that community food growing can improve people’s overall fitness and healthy eating, alleviate the symptoms of mental illness, and help cancer sufferers cope with the distressing effects of their treatment. The authors undertook a review of international scientific research demonstrating the benefits of gardening and community food growing for physical and mental wellbeing. They are now calling on health professionals to put community food growing ‘on prescription’, for the many health benefits this would achieve.

GrowingHealth_BenefitsReportEntitled ‘The Benefits of Gardening and Food Growing for Health and Wellbeing’, the study has been launched at a conference for health professionals and food growing project organizers, that took place 2nd April 2014 in London. The conference was organized by Growing Health, a charitable initiative helping community food growing projects to demonstrate their benefits and persuade GPs and local health services to invest in the support and services they can provide.

For the large number of people in our society – children and adults – who live with challenging physical or mental health problems, gardening and community food growing can be especially beneficial,” said Professor Tim Lang, chair of the Growing Health conference.

Such activities can relieve the symptoms of serious illnesses, prevent the development of some serious conditions, reduce stress and introduce people to a way of life that can help them to improve their own well-being in the longer term.”

The Growing Health organizers have reviewed many working examples of GPs and health professionals already using community food growing to treat physical and mental health conditions. One example, whose organizers will share their experiences at the conference, is Sydenham Gardens in South London, founded by local residents and a local GP to provide gardening, nature conservation and creative opportunities for local people. Patients are referred to the project through their GP or key worker.

This important new study of the evidence for the benefits of gardening and community food growing is a call to action for health professionals,” said Maria Devereaux, Growing Health project officer. “Pioneering action, already piloted by local GPs and health authorities, to put gardening and food growing ‘on prescription’ should now be recognised and replicated throughout the NHS, and local authority planners should protect and create food growing spaces, for the benefit of everyone.”

The Growing Health conference will feature inspiring case studies of food growing ‘on prescription’, and a presentation from Joe Sempik of the University of Nottingham – a leading authority on social and therapeutic horticulture – on how food growing projects can measure their benefits to prove their worth to the health service.

The full study ‘The Benefits of Gardening and Food Growing for Health and Wellbeing’, is available at www.growinghealth.info

Growing Health is a national project run by the charities Garden Organic (www.gardenorganic.org.uk) and Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming (www.sustainweb.org), and funded by the Tudor Trust charitable foundation. The project aims to see how community food growing can be routinely used by the health and social care services as a way of promoting health and wellbeing for a range of individuals and population groups. See: www.growinghealth.info

Tim Lang is professor of food policy at the Centre for Food Policy at City University London. He is also a Fellow of the Faculty of Public Health, President of the charity Garden Organic, and a keen vegetable grower. See: www.city.ac.uk/people/academics/timothy-lang

Several case studies of GPs and health professionals using gardening and food growing to treat health conditions are published at: www.sustainweb.org/growinghealth/case_studies/ and The Sydenham Gardens case study is downloadable at: www.sustainweb.org/resources/files/reports/GH_SydenhamCaseStudy.pdf

Full Disclosure Statement: The GREEN (LIVING) REVIEW received no compensation for any component of this article.

This article is for your information only and the GREEN (LIVING) REVIEW does not (necessarily) approve, endorse or recommend the product, service, company or organization mentioned.

The current crisis of the modern world

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

capitalistcrisisAt the time of writing in the first decades of the 21st century the world is in a serious crisis far bigger than “just” an economic one. The crisis is consistent of – one – and economic one based on an unsustainable perpetual growth and – two – the fact that the system is collapsing and – three – the climate is changing and means that we all have to change and make changes.

There are many changes that we have to make and we must take many small and large steps – aside from throwing the bankers from their ivory towers, though not necessarily literally – to change the way we live, the way we work and everything else, including the way the world operates. Please note that I did not say “the way we are governed” because if we are free people than government has no place.

As far as the changing climate is concerned it is probably 90% man-made and 10% natural and the former we can do something about the latter I doubt that we can. And because we can do something about the former, that is the man-made part of climate change we must do something about it and it starts with each and everyone of us. But that is but one, though large, part of the crisis.

Our current and ongoing economic crisis – and let no one deceive us that it is over or is about to end – and the climate crisis is a greater threat to security than terrorism.

The so-called economic recovery that is being banded about is but an illusion as it is not founded on more or renewed buying power in the average person's hand and cannot be sustained. And then again we must get away from notion and concept of perpetual growth in the economy anyway as it simply is not sustainable in any way or shape.

The current economic model, however, with overproduction leading to unemployment leading to a lack of purchasing power, leading to overproduction leading to unemployment... you get the picture, I am sure, was designed this way, unfortunately, and no mere tinkering around with it will ever make it any less susceptible to a boom and bust cycle.

The modern industrialization with mechanized production and ever more mechanization today leads to a system that exploits the workers, at home and abroad, and the environment.

Where, in the pre-industrial age our needs were met by the (local) producers and craftsmen who could only make one item at a time and then, predominately, from more or less local materials, today goods, the “need” for which is often created artificially through advertising, are made from materials that come from all around the globe and the good are often made in low wage countries and then shipped around the globe to the consumer.

Mechanized factory production led also to the pool of a permanent unemployed workforce, to overproduction and to the destruction of the environment.

The wage economy was the best that ever happened to the capitalist. He no longer had to feed, house and clothe his slaves in his workshops and on hi plantations. He gave them the freedom to work for money, thus making them wage slaves, where he could then get them to pay him rent for housing and also have them buy the things they needed in the stores owned by him at inflated prices. And while this may not entirely be true anymore today, as to the rents and the stores, as most capitalist employers no longer hold the housing stock and have stores where the workers are forced to buy the wage slavery still persists.

We must reign in our wants, masquerading as needs, and look once again to having our real needs met locally and also to making (again) many more of those things that we need (and want) ourselves.

This is not something that the powers that be will wish to hear and even less see as that interferes totally with their programs. However, we must do it for our own good and especially for the good of the Planet and thus for our ultimate survival as individuals and as a species.

Living within our means

Living within our means does not just mean living with in our financial means but also and especially on an economic level and that is to say that we must change the way we make things, have products once again made so that they can be prepared and made more or less locally.

We live on a finite Planet with finite non-renewable resources – the renewable ones are a little bit a different kettle of fish – but we behave as if the Planet and those resources can grow according to our demands.

The perpetual growth economy is not sustainable on a Planet that cannot grown and whose non-renewable resources are already almost used up. Thus we must reduce our consumption and learn to make do with less and to demand products that do not have obsolescence designed in but which can be fixed when something breaks.

It once was that way and that was even still not so long ago and, for example, old wireless sets (radio receivers) that ran with valves (tubes to our American cousins) still often work to this very day and, as long as spare valves are available, can be kept running almost for ever.

They were designed to be repairable and many person acquired the DIY skills to replace valves, do a bit of necessary soldering here and there, and such, to keep them going and they did. They were a bit like the old VW Beetle in the old ad that said “it runs, and runs and runs” and, once again, it did for, once again, it could be fixed and kept running, often by the driver with a little knowledge only. And the many old East German cars of the Wartburg and Trabant models, being two-stroke engines even, that still run today, lovingly cared for and repaired by their owners also speak volumes of what can be done if industry has the right attitude and not one where not new inventions are used to sell new products but a simple trick of built-in obsolescence.

The repairability of goods created a whole sector of work of its own with repair shops for this, that and the other, and entire business collectives even existed, such as in the German Democratic Republic, geared to keeping every item working for as long as at all possible, and all those repairs were 100times cheaper than replacing the products with new ones. And it was for that very reason that they were doing a roaring trade.

There were, however, many users everywhere who taught themselves the necessary skills in order to fix the things that they had themselves and things were made in such a way that fixing them was not rocket science anyway.

We must return to this sensible approach and ideally and as much as possible have products made to last at home, as close to home as at all feasible, much like it was in the age before mechanization of production.

Apply total localism (as far as possible)

When we speak here of localism, even total localism, it is something to be aimed for as, in reality, at present, for most products and goods it is not even remotely possible and even getting “Made in England” or “Made in USA”, or other home countries, is often rather difficult. But we must aim for this and not just “made in home country” but “made in home county”.

We need to return to some of the ways of old – most of them, actually – and that includes making many of the things that we need and want ourselves and also growing our own food.

While a garden with flowers and lots of lawn may look nice and provide food for the eye, the flowers especially, it does very little for us, for the wildlife and even less for the environment as a whole. Lawns, in fact, gobble up lots of water for nothing. They serve no purpose and a vegetable garden equally can look as good as does a formal garden with flowers.

Peas were not, originally and initially, grown as a food crop in Britain, for instance, but for their flowers and the fact that the, sort of, climbed and trailed. And the flowers of beans too look very gorgeous and they can create nice looking arbors that, at the same time, produce food.

In addition to that there are many flowers that are edible, either in part or in their entirety and they can be planted together with other crop plants, as many are valuable companion plants to those crops, keeping pests at bay naturally without the need for pesticides.

It is true that goods, made in local workshops, with more or less hand tools and not the large scale mechanization of factories are more expensive, take longer to make and are, in many cases, one off items in that they are not produced in production lines with templates and such like. On the other hand they are, in general, made to last, can be fixed easily, and, in addition to that, you know where the product comes from and even who made it and you are paying that worker and not some corporation.

When you buy from a (local) farmer direct – more or less – or from a (local) maker and workshop you help put food on the table for a family, and not create profit for some faceless corporation and its shareholders.

While it may be a little more expensive to buy from a local organic farmer or a maker who produces by hand and to order than food produced on a factory farm or something made in a factory, probably with slave or prison labor in China, you know what you are getting, by way of food and as far as your other items are concerned something that is made with love and something that is made to last.

The perpetual growth economy cannot continue

It just is not possible to keep growing the economy on a finite Planet whose resources are, bar the renewable ones, limited and most of them are already exhausted, at the brink of this status or not very far away from it. Thus we cannot continue with business as usual and at least we as people have to understand that even if our so-called leaders and governments do not want to.

Capitalism and the notion that the economy has to keep growing in order for people to have work and all that is a fallacy and the greatest enemy to the environment and ecosystem and human survival.

That is not too say that the way the so-called socialist and communist countries of the twentieth (and one or two of those still remain in the twenty-first century) have run their economies was any better. Those were but Stalinist state capitalist ones and many were also, instead of first and foremost producing for the domestic market, geared too export production, whether it was the USSR or the GRD or others. However, for some reason they managed to look after the people in general better.

For all of us to be able to live in harmony with each other and all other of Mother Earth's children we must change the way we live and “consume” and we will have to learn to make to do with less, but more importantly we must demand products – or make them ourselves – that last and that can be easily repaired, either by DIY or by repair shops and the latter brings about another, though not new, sector to the economy, the repair economy. We once had it and we must bring it back. In the German Democratic Republic, the so-called Communist East Germany, an entire sector of the economy was geared to repairing things and entire repair “factories” existed.

There was also a time when most people made as much as possible themselves and prided themselves of their skills of doing a great majority of things for themselves and their families (and communities). And this making things for yourself is also something that we will have to revive and not just while the crisis continues. It has to be something that remains and becomes part of our normal lives again, the way it was for the majority once upon a time.

The crisis is not just an economic one

The crisis is not just an economic one but it is a crisis also of the political system and sickness of society in general. And that means that we must change the entire system for a new one and not just replace one government for another.

In order to tackle the crisis proper the political part cannot be removed from the economic part and vice versa and both have to be considered together almost as a single entity.

The sickness of society also is part of the whole as the economic system of perpetual growth and the manufactured needs and wants and the political one is what has caused this sickness in society and has turned it into a rat race.

© 2014

Gardening Myths and Misconceptions – Book Review

Review by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

myths_and_misconceptions_gardening_cover_front_draft.1.1.2Gardening Myths and Misconceptions
by Charles Dowding
Published by Green Books, March 2014
Hardback 96 pages, with illustrations
£9.99 hardback
ISBN: 9780857842046

  • Have you ever wondered how certain gardening practices arose?

  • Have you wondered whether they were just eyewash, but followed them anyway, because it's been too confusing to work out the kernel of truth behind it all?

  • Have you ever asked yourself why containers must have pottery shards for drainage? Why cucumbers and tomatoes should not be grown together? Or why we must water only in the evening?

In this collection of common gardening myths, Charles Dowding examines how some of these practices, though started for good historical reasons, have become unbreakable rules.

Asking why gardeners are always told to do things a certain way, he debunks some of these myths and clears up some misconceptions. Based on his own vast experience, he tests the relevance of such hard and fast rules himself and radically rethinks them into simpler, quicker and more successful ways to garden.

Conventional wisdom is difficult to question, even when it is misguided and contains many contradictions. Gardening has its share of such 'myths' - some with discernible origins in history, others that have become established for no obvious reason - and they often obscure simpler and easier methods of working. This delightfully illustrated book reveals how common sense triumphs and crops are more successful when these 'rules' are overturned.

This is a fascinating but practical book that will save the seasoned gardener time and give new gardeners heart.

Beautifully illustrated, this is an invaluable book, full of good sensible gardening advice.

Being a professional gardener and – originally – a forester it is absolutely amazing the myths that we have been taught and that we have used without, all too often, questioning them. Though I have advised against staking trees for years and years but always met with resistance for colleagues with the comment that all newly planted trees must be staked; it says so. Well, it is a myth and it is best for trees not to be stakes in the great majority of cases with a few exceptions.

This is indeed a beautiful little book. Hardback bound and with its own little red ribbon bookmark. A book to keep and cherish and to give as gift.

This book will make a great gift for any gardener and with Father's Day coming up soon it might just be the ticket. It won't break the bank and even the most seasoned gardener will appreciate the information contained within the pages of this book.

Charles Dowding is an internationally recognized organic gardening expert and adviser, and author of 'Organic Gardening', 'Salad Leaves for all Seasons' and How to Grow Winter Vegetables'. He says: "I have always been interested in looking 'behind the scenes' and asking why things are as they are, and questioning practices that are taken for granted. This led me to grow organically, at a time when the chemical approach was rarely challenged." He talks on radio and television and writes for many magazines on his unique approach to gardening.

© 2014

Disclosure: I received a copy of  Gardening Myths and Misconceptions for review purposes, but all opinions here are mine.

The GREEN (LIVING) REVIEW received no compensation for any component of this article.

Don’t write handwriting off yet!

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

GetBritainWriting_smlWriting by hand is becoming fashionable again, and stationery and pens have never looked so good.

There are pens, including and especially fountain pens (again) of all kinds and notebooks in all manner of funky colors and designs. And many of those – pens and notebooks – could be seen at the London Stationery Show held from April 1 to April 2, 2014.

It was – in my opinion – good to see that fountain pens are back again (with a vengeance) and paper notebooks in all manner of forms and those notebooks that are made by Castelli in Italy (and yes, Made in Italy) or Leuchtturm1917 (Made in Germany) are FSC certified and as far as Castelli is concerned all the workers are unionized and thus conditions for the workers thus are good. The same cannot be said in places where many other notebooks and such like are produced, such as in a number of countries of the Far East.

Pen and paper are far from dead. In fact both are having a revival and a ball and there is nothing whatsoever wrong with paper and using it. It does not cause the destruction of the rainforest. It is a myth that must be put to bed or better still buried. Palm oil, on the other hand, does cause serious destruction to the rainforest as do certain farming practices in Brazil and other countries near the equator.

Quality paper notebooks and high quality writing instruments, including and especially fountain pens, are in demand by the new generation of hipsters. What to the Sloane Ranger generation was the Lefax and the Filofax to the new hipster generation is the Moleskine (and similar) notebooks and the fountain pen.

Despite the fact that we are in the so-called digital age pen and paper more than have their place here and with the revelations that our online communications and things that we store there – and even on our computers – are not safe from prying eyes, the letter, the notebook, the pen and the typewriter even, have their place and are even been given a pride of importance – paper and typewriter that is especially – in the Russian intelligence and security community. And if they are concerned with their high grade of encryption I think we all should be. So, let's get back to paper and the pen or typewriter.

The London Stationery Show also had a great number of other green and greenish inventions on show such as notepads made from stone paper. The latter is made from limestone waste from the quarrying industry and thus kept out of landfills.

Just before the beginning of the London Stationery Show the National Stationery Week’s, Get Britain Writing and Get Kids Writing campaigns took off and a long list of retailers and the Post Office are standing behind this.

While one could say that to some extent all of them have a vested interest, the retailers wanting to see sales go up and the Post Office the use of the letter service again, to get back to writing properly is a very good idea indeed. We must also combine that with teaching children not just good handwriting – I can't writer properly myself by hand though – and the proper use of grammar. They are writing a letter not sending a text message on their cell phones. And when it comes to letters; there is still something almost magical about a letter (no, not a bill or some advertising) dropping through the letterbox.

I know that I am extremely old-fashioned as to the use of pen and paper and am always accused of being biased towards paper being a commercial forester by original trade. And I am also very biased towards the old-fashioned fountain pen.

Having mentioned the latter I must mention the fact that Meisenbach pens from Germany have a new rather innovative product on the market which combines the fountain pen (ink cartridge) with the ballpoint pen in one. With this one, when you run out of ink you simply replace the cheap common garden ink cartridge for a few pence and the empty one can go for recycling being made of PE.

Writing and being able to write (properly) matters, if anything more than ever in a digital age. And of course you can never have too much stationery, including notebooks and pens.

© 2014

How many envelopes wasted?

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

How many envelopes from letters and other materials received on a daily basis in our homes and businesses are wasted despite the fact that the backs are clean and thus could be used for notes? One can but wonder as to how many hundreds and more of notepads this would be equal to.

sugru-envelope-back_webWe often hear the term that something was designed on the back of an envelope (even of a cigarette packet) but very few, I am sure, reuse the back of envelopes in this or a similar way. Most will simpl, without a second thought, throw them away.

I tend to keep all envelopes of A5 and A4 size and those that can be reused as envelopes for letters and such, such as by folding an A4 down to a C5 and an A5 to a C6 envelope, while with others the backs are used as notepaper.

Now the other day I received some sugru samples from, well, sugru and their C5 envelope was printed with a “To Do List” on the back and I must say that that idea is a marvelous one. What is all envelopes were, for instance, lines on the back, such as the C4 and C5 ones so that people would automatically recognize a reuse for them as notepad pages? There is a thought for the makers of envelopes, I should think.

While it is true that, in the end, after having been used for notes, drawings, or such the envelope will get thrown out more than likely anyway, but that is not too tragic. At least it was been given a second life as notepad, even if but for a while and has saved other paper from being wasted in the process.

In times gone by, like so many other things, the backs of envelopes were not wasted but used for writing upon and it was common for such notes to be, also, retained in someone's filing system, and why not.

With all our technology and also now the developing green consciousness I sometimes do not think that we have progressed at all in comparison, when it concerns the green issues of life, and think that many of our ancestors were much better at it than are we. The need for thrift had, I know, quite a lot to do with it but why do we behave so different then today, I wonder.

Many in the green movement even cannot see this reuse and tend to go out and buy recycled paper notepads rather than making use of what comes through their letterbox and that of their offices day in day out. Those going out and buy recycled paper notepads (and other recycled products) rather than reusing actually think that they do a good deed for the environment. Reuse in this, as in so many other areas is totally overlooked often because we seem to have been totally brainwashed into recycling and buying green products rather than using our brains.

Most people feel so please with themselves, believing they have such a green conscience, when they throw such envelopes in the recycling bin and this is the problem the recycling mantra per se. it stops us, it would appear, from using our brains and finding reuses for our “waste”. Time to rethink and for a different road to travel.

© 2014

Square Foot Gardening Plant Spacers (set of three) – Product Review

Review by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

Have you ever wanted to get into square foot gardening but just could not be bothered with creating, time and again, for planting, the grind pattern made with string?

4601766104I did but that playing about with the string put me off. Now there is an answer available by way of the plant spacers designed and handmade in Britain in Sandy, in Bedfordshire.

This is about the easiest way to space plants/seeds for square foot gardening with no need to mark out your beds saving time and effort.

Get bumper crops in your raised beds with minimal effort, time and money. Square foot gardening is particularly effective in the summer months by saving water and reduced the amount of space for weeds to grow.

The three guides in this pack allow you to plant 1, 2, 4, 8, 9 or 16 seeds/plants per square foot, depending on the kind of vegetables that you wish to plant and grow. Some require a great deal more space than others.

Planting guide printed on guides so no need to work out spacing from packets or reading books. Simply look at the guides for the vegetable you wish to plant and in brackets will be the number of plants to put in a square foot listed on the correct guide to use and there is a handy ruler in inches and cm on each guide.

Dirt and soil cleans easily off guide and it will not weather or deteriorate so can be used for years to come.

Produced from recyclable PVC and handmade in the UK.

All three guides in the pack at just £11.99 and they will last almost for ever.

http://squaredgardening.co.uk/

These templates are an absolute doddle to use and they also work well enough in not so square beds, as mine are, being builder bags filled with soil.

© 2014

Disclosure: I received a set of plant spacers at the Edible Garden Show 2014 for review purposes, but all opinions here are mine.

The GREEN (LIVING) REVIEW received no compensation for any component of this article.

Labour will only succeed as a pro-business party: Ed Balls

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

Red_flag_wavingIn an interview with the Financial Times in January 2014 Ed Balls, the Shadow Chancellor, stated that “Labour will only succeed as a pro-business party” and this is where he shows his true colors and they are definitely not the Labour red and it shows how far that the party has traveled since its inception as a party for the trade union movement and how far it has gone off course.

There is already an abundance of pro-business parties at Westminster, more than enough of them, one should think. The three main parties are already vying with UKIP to be the most pro-business party, and Labour is no exception here. To many, the sight of the traditional workers party turning gamekeeper leaves the socialists and those of the working class scratching our heads.

It would appear that Ed Balls is stuck in the Westminster bubble where the needs of the City of London take priority over the needs of the rest of the country and he needs to get out and see real life for a while. And he is, that must be said, not the only one in that party who needs to do so. They need to immerse themselves in the lives of the people, the working class who they are meant to represent, and see what life it truly like.

There are many self-proclaimed socialist in the Labour Party who would not know what socialism is meant to be even if it bit them in the proverbial backside. They would not even recognize it.

Socialism – and that is what the true Labour Party was based upon when it was founded as a political party by the Unions – is about the people, the working people, the working class, and about the peasantry and not about aiding and abetting the capitalists. Capitalism cannot be reformed. It must be ended.

For too long the Labour Party and its cousins, the so-called Social-Democrat parties in Europe (and elsewhere), have tried to play Socialism Lite, trying to create “capitalism with a human face”, as they refer to it. Sorry, it does not work and will never work. The corporations will see to that, and that includes the corporations called governments. Capitalism will never have a human face regardless of what any of those parties will try and try to tell the people.

All the Social-Democrats everywhere, including Labour in Britain, have been doing is tinkering around the edges and always mindful not too upset the business community.

Nothing against business, but it has to be business where the means of production are in the hands of the workers and the farmers and not where they are in the hands of either private exploiters, national or international corporations, or indeed the state, as was done under so-called socialism in the countries that adopted the Stalinist approach. State capitalism is not socialism. That means no nationalization of businesses with the possible exception of the vital utilities such as electricity, gas and water.

Neither capitalism per se, nor nationalization, that is to say state capitalism, under the guise of people-owned companies, is working or has worked, as far as business is concerned and the rights and incomes of the workers and peasants. Only when the means of production are owned by those who use them and produce the goods and services will a change come about in the condition of those who work in the shops, workshops and factories and in the fields and forests, and will turn those workers from slaves to owners. No nationalization can and will ever do that.

For far too long, during the the twentieth and now in the twenty-first century have we interpreted socialism as businesses being owned by the state. That is not what the term “means of production in the hands of the workers” means. It means what it says, namely that the means of production must be owned by those who do the work and not owned by the state or any private individual or group of people.

Those who interpret the term “means of production in the hands of the workers” as the businesses being owned by the state remind me of the people who love to interpret the Bible in similar ways that suit them and who manage to read stuff “between the lines”.

The problem also is political parties per se and the Labour Party is no exception there in that a party will always force its members to, especially when they are part of the government or opposition, vote along party lines and will not allow them to vote according to their consciences or the brief they have received from their constituents or even the grassroots of the party. The truth is that if Labour moves any further away from its roots and the working class it will not succeed but fail, and fail miserably.

Unless, and I say that even though I advocate the destruction of the party system altogether, the Labour Party returns to its roots, to socialism and total support of the working class it is not fit for the purpose and thus the working class will need to find a new way and leave that party far behind.

The trade unions should remove their support for this party now and tell it where to go for it is, after all, the party that the trade unions gave life to. It must be allowed to flounder and be cast upon the waters to sink if it is not willing to return to its roots and its values.

But, the trade unions, more than once, themselves have abandoned the workers for political gains, especially the TUC, and we of the working class must never forget that either. Too many of the leadership of the unions love their power, love to exert it and fear to lose it and to that end are prepared to make all manner of compromises, leaving the workers out in the cold.

Let's not forget who stabbed the miners in the back in 1926 and even in the Thatcher era. It was the TUC. The congress of the trade unions, that it is purported to be but which it, apparently, is not.

We already have a Tory Party and we don't need a pink version of the same. The country and the working class of this country need a true red organization that will bring about true socialism for the working class where the means of production truly will be in the hands of the workers. We need a true worker ownership of the means of production and not state capitalism, under whichever guise it masquerades. But, alas, the Labour Party of today would never understand that and neither does the British Communist Party, alas, nor any others.

© 2014

Old garden tools need not to be thrown

by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

old-trowel-with-sugru1_smlOld garden tools are, in many instances, better than new ones and even if a handle is no longer, even for a trowel, in the best of states there are ways of rescuing them.

This I did recently with a very old garden trowel were the top of the handle had a rather large crack in it and also where at other places the wood was a little, or a little more even, rough and cracked.

Initially I tried to use sugru to fill the crack of the handle and then cap it with the same material but, alas, because of the state of the crack this did not work. So a couple of experiments later I filled it with Gorilla Glue and this entirely repaired the crack and, as the glue hardens to such an extent that it can also be sanded the handle was almost as good as new at that area. I could, I know, have used the traditional method of repairing cracks in wood, such as wood glue mixed with sawdust but I neither had sawdust not wood glue to hand.

Then came sugru into use as a cap over the crack and at the bottom end where the trowel is fitted into the handle and, voila, it is, once again, a useable trowel that is also safe for the hands of the user.

Often all it takes to make an old handle useable again and safe so as not to end up with splinters is to sand it down and wax or oil lit but applying sugru at certain points makes it still better and, at the same time, makes it look a little more colorful and that way it can also be spotted easier when put down.

I could have added also, as the picture below shows, grip improvements but am quite happy with the way it is as it is now though.

garden tool grip_webI am sure I will find some more tools to repair and improve with use of sugru (and by other means) as there is really no need, in most cases, to ditch those old tools for new ones; none whatsoever.

Old tools often are much better quality and better design than many of the cheap and cheerful modern ones; and the cheap is in quality only and not in price more often than not.

© 2014